God doest not require all countries worldwide
to exercise the same political system.
Zhao
Qizheng, minister of the Information Office of the State
Council, commented on the claim that the Chinese Government
restricts press freedom while meeting a visiting delegation
from the World Association of Newspapers a short time ago in
Beijing.
In strict terms, the Chinese
governments attitude toward the press is management
but not control, said Zhao. China has more than 8,000kinds
of magazines, over 2,000 types of newspapers and more than
2,000 TV stations, including county-level ones. The Chinese
government neither has the capacity to examine the contents
of so many media units, nor has it the desire to do so.
There are 550,000 people in China involved in the media. We
encourage them to study and never intend to control them.
However, the Chinese government requires them not to do
things that violate the Constitution. For instance, the
press should not engage in inciting activities with the aim
of overthrowing Chinas political power. Adverting
violence and pornography is not permitted, as such reports
do not tally with the fundamental interests of the Chinese
people and Chinas cultural tradition.
The
Western medias claim that Chinas media has no
freedom is mainly due to the fact that Chinas media
does not attack the governments existing policies,
said Zhao.
The Chinese government encourages the media
to supervise and criticize public servants. The media can
comment on and conduct academic discussions about the
governments policies. For instance, the media can
expose the crimes of law-breaking officials and criticize
local governments failure to implement government
policies, such as those related to environmental protection.
In the final analysis, the crux lies in the fact that China
does not exercise a two-party political system like some
other countries, and correspondingly the media cannot
reflect the fight between two parties. Owing to this, some
people say chinas media has no freedom and even claim
that the Chinese government is autocratic.
Because
China does not exercise a tow-party or multiparty system,
there are no attacks against the government by the media
driven by the interests of a specific party. In essence, the
attacks launched by Western media asserting that
Chinas media is deprived of freedom are directed
against Chinas political system of China is different
from those of Western countries.
China is a country
with multi-party cooperation under the leadership of the
Communist Party of China. Most foreigners dont know
this, and those who do know generally dont agree with
it, as this system is different from that of their own
countries. God does not require all countries worldwide to
exercise the same political system. Chinas system is
determined by our won national conditions. China has the
largest population in the world. Our per-capita GDP had just
approached USD 1,000 by the end of 2002, which was
equivalent to one-10th of the Republic of Korea. Chinese
citizens who have received a higher education only has two
neighboring or allied countries, our situation is much more
complicated. In the previous one century over the past 150
years, China had remained a defeated nation in all defense
wars with other countries. To live on an equal footing with
other countries in the world, the Chinese nation must become
powerful. The practice of Chinas social development
proves that only the Communist Party of China(CPC) can make
the Chinese nation powerful. Foreigners may find it
difficult to understand this. But, the existing system of
China is chosen by the Chinese people themselves. The
leadership of the CPC has won the widespread support of the
Chinese people. The people of China, a country with a
long-standing cultural tradition, wont accept an
autocratic government. This is clearly
justified.
The claim that Chinas media has no
freedom is, in fact, an attack against Chinas state
and political systems. This explains the practice of some
Western media in misguiding the public opinion related to China.